Tag Archives: policy

Health IT Update – Feb 4, 2010

1. Today: Free Public Forum on HIT National Policy with David Blumenthal – Thursday, 8am-noon (www.hitpublicforum.com)

The Public Form on HIT National Policy is hosting a free conference this morning (it is starting right now!) with a great lineup of speakers, including David Blumenthal, the National Coordinator for Health IT, Marc Overhage, Director of Med Informatics at Regenstrief Institute, Aneesh Chopra, US Chief Technology Officer at the White House, and several others. Registration is free and the entire event will be webcasted. Blumenthal speaks from 9-9:30am. Content will be available online for 6 months…

2. Free OpenMRS Developer Training Week starting Feb 8

The Regenstrief Institute at Indiana University, the developers of OpenMRS, the popular open-source medical record system, are hosting a free week-long training session at IU beginning Monday, Feb 8. Most of the event will be webcasted. For more details: http://openmrs.org/wiki/OpenMRS_Developer_Training_Week_8-February-2010

3. Health Affairs February Issue on e-Health in the Developing World

This month’s Health Affairs issue is focused on e-health in the developing world, and includes articles on “An Agenda For Action On Global E-Health”, “e-Health Technologies Show Promise in Developing Countries”, and others on cell phones, EMR, informatics, and more.

http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/vol29/issue2/

Advertisements

Obama & McCain health policies

Jason Shafrin, author of the Healthcare Economist blog, wrote an excellent one-page summary differentiating Obama’s and McCain’s strategies for healthcare reform: http://healthcare-economist.com/2008/08/18/obama-vs-mccain-health-care-policies/. Obama’s government-led plan focuses on creation of larger risk pools and compulsary health insurance for children and young adults. McCain’s plan is based on individual agency and free market principles.

If health is a right, as decided by the World Health Organization, and only governments can provide citizens with real rights, then the government must be involved in ensuring its population has the capability to access a basic package of health services. The healthcare system is fundamentally different than the marketplace, which means consumers interact with the healthcare system very differently. Some of the differences:

  1. Information Monopoly – Consumers cannot easily make informed decisions about what services should be provided or how much they should pay for them.
  2. Emergencies – Most consumers, especially sick ones, don’t have time or the knowledge to navigate the health care system to find the best deal. Obama said it very succintly: “When your child gets sick, you don’t go shopping for the best bargain.”
  3. Insurance Pools – Insurance plans require large subscriber bases to spread risk and share costs. The private, state-specific insurance plans have not been capable of creating large enough pools to bring costs down.
  4. False Competition – The open marketplace forces companies to compete for customers on prices and quality. In healthcare, companies compete for market shares but not in a way that improves quality. Costs are usually lowered at the expense of quality. Consumers will sacrifice on the comprehensiveness of their insurance plan for lowered premiums without realizing that the uncovered services statistically improve population health.
McCain’s plan would increase the number of insurance subscribers, but would also make the system more dependent on consumers understanding of their health needs and more dependent on market principles that simply don’t apply to health care.
Obama’s plan is initially more costly, but it will result in an even greater increase in insurance subscribers (especially among children and young adults), and moves responsibility for population health away from individuals and into the hands of the only entity that can provide basic rights to a population level: government.